REFORMULASI KURIKULUM BERBASIS LITERASI DIGITAL PADA ERA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: PERSPEKTIF TEKNOLOGI PENDIDIKAN

Syukron Jamal

doi:10.51499/cp.v10i1.924

Authors

Syukron Jamal Universitas Islam Depok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51499/cp.v10i1.924

Keywords:

Curriculum, Digital Literacy, Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology, Society 5.0

Abstract

Digital transformation and the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) have significantly changed various aspects of human life, including education systems. These changes require educational institutions to develop human resources equipped with adequate digital literacy skills to adapt to increasingly complex technological developments. However, several indicators reveal that literacy levels in Indonesia still face substantial challenges. The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 reported that Indonesian students’ reading literacy performance remains below the OECD average (OECD, 2023). This condition is reinforced by the Indonesian Digital Society Index (IMDI), which indicates that Indonesia's digital maturity remains at a moderate level (Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, 2025). This article aims to analyze curriculum reformulation in strengthening digital literacy in the era of Artificial Intelligence from the perspective of educational technology. The study employs a qualitative approach using a library research method. Data were collected from OECD and UNESCO reports, scholarly journals, and educational technology theories. The findings indicate that digital literacy-based curriculum development should integrate twenty-first-century competencies, AI literacy, and educational technology theories such as constructivism, connectivism, multimedia learning, TPACK, and SAMR. Curriculum reformulation, teacher competency development, and digital infrastructure enhancement are strategic factors in creating an adaptive learning ecosystem. Therefore, digital literacy-based curriculum reform is essential to prepare learners for the challenges of Society 5.0.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belshaw, D. (2014). The essential elements of digital literacies. Self-published.

Cabinet Office of Japan. (2021). Society 5.0. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan.

Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html (Diakses 27 Februari 2026).

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Publishing.

Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.). (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia. (2025). Indeks Masyarakat Digital Indonesia (IMDI) 2025. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.

Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the digital society. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 151–176).

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education: The responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11575–11599.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Mulyasa, E. (2023). Pengembangan dan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Print, M. (2020). Curriculum development and design (6th ed.). Routledge.

Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.). Pearson.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.

Schwab, K. (2019). Revolusi industri keempat (Farah Diena & Andi Tarigan, Penerj.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs report. World Economic Forum.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27.